Mora v. USA

Filing 9

ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion To Substitute Respondent (Doc. 8 ), ORDER Directing Clerk Of The Court To Substitute "B. Wagner" For "USA" As Respondent, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/2/2010. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 USA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D is t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CESAR ESPINOZA MORA, Petitioner, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-00033-JLT HC ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT (Doc. 8) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO SUBSTITUTE "B. WAGNER" FOR "USA" AS RESPONDENT Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed the instant petition on December 22, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. (Doc. 1). On January 7, 2010, the case was transferred to this Court. (Doc. 4). On March 17, 2010, after screening the petition, the Court issued an order requiring Petitioner to file a motion to substitute the name of his current warden for "USA" or face dismissal of the petition for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 7). On March 29, 2010, Petitioner filed his motion to name B. Wagner as Respondent in this case. (Doc. 8). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. /// /// 1 Petitioner's motion to substitute respondents (Doc. 8), is GRANTED; and, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D is t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia 2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to substitute the name of "B. Wagner, Warden," for "USA" as the named respondent in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 2, 2010 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?