Hill v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/22/09 ordering that plaintiff's shall file their opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss 23 , 29 on or before 01/22/10. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9 hart3094.stip(opp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHAWNA HARTMANN & CAREN HILL, No. CIV S-08-3094 DAD P vs. CAL. DEP'T CORRS. & REHABILITATION, et al., ORDER / The parties in this action have filed a stipulation to extend the time for plaintiffs to file an opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file their opposition on or before January 22, 2010. DATED: December 22, 2009.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
