Hill v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 89

ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time for plaintiff to file a response to defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint; response by 10/6/2010; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/24/2010. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARBARA A. MCGRAW (#117115) 1170 Bollinger Canyon Road Moraga, CA 94556 Telephone: (925) 631-4061 Facsimile: (925) 376-5625 Email: bmcgraw9@mac.com Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION SHAWNA HARTMANN and CAREN HILL, Case No. 1:10-CV-00045-LJO-SMS v. Matthew Cate, et al., ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO Plaintiffs, EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Pending before the Court is the Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Joint Stipulation to extend time for Plaintiffs to e-file and e-serve their opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby grants the parties' request to extend time for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint to October 6, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 24, 2010 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER_________________ HONORABLE SANDRA M. SNYDER 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Leave to File Corrected Second Amended Cmplt. (1:10-00045-JLO-SMS) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Leave to File Corrected Second Amended Cmplt. (1:10-00045-JLO-SMS) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?