Tilei v. McGuinness et al
Filing
85
ORDER DENYING 83 and 84 Motion for Reimbursement of Incorrect Filing Fees, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/30/2018. (Copy of this order forwarded to Litigation Coordinator at Kern Valley State Prison) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PUNAOFO TSUGITO TILEI,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:10-cv-00069-LJO-SKO (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR REIMBURSEMENT
OF FILING FEES
McGUINNESS, et al.,
(Docs. 83, 84)
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff, Punaofo Tsugito Tilei, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This action proceeded against
17
Defendants C.M.O. William J. McGuinness M.D., Jeremy Wang M.D., H. Hasrdsri M.D., Joseph
18
Obriza M.D., Julian Kim M.D., Jeffrey Neubarth M.D., N. Loadholt, FNP, and P. Rouch, FNP for
19
deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment
20
which the Ninth Circuit found cognizable under section 1983. (Docs. 43, 44.)
21
Although this action has settled and closed, Plaintiff has filed two motions requesting
22
reimbursement of filing fees which he believes were incorrectly withdrawn from his inmate trust
23
account. (Docs. 83, 84.) Plaintiff seeks reimbursement of $455.00 which he believes was
24
incorrectly withdrawn as duplicate payment of the filing fee in this action.
25
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s account and finds that Plaintiff is not owed a
26
reimbursement. Specifically, Plaintiff owed the initial $350.00 filing fee and two $455.00 filing
27
fees for two appeals he filed in this action. (See Docs. 29-31 for Appeal 13-16038; Docs. 35-37
28
1
1
for Appeal 13-6298.)1
Plaintiff submitted a copy of the transaction list for his account and underlined three
2
3
$455.00 withdrawals: one for Appeal 13-62982 and two for this case. (Doc. 84, p. 5.) The filing
4
fee for this action was only $350.00, not $455.00. The Court already issued Plaintiff a $105.00
5
refund for the difference, which Plaintiff has acknowledged receiving. (Doc. 84, p. 2.) The
6
current dispute lies over the second $455.00 noted as withdrawn for the filing fee in this action.
7
That sum was for Plaintiff’s filing fee for Appeal 13-16038, and was not a duplicate payment of
8
the filing fee in this action. The error merely lies in the notation of payment “source” for the
9
$455.00 withdrawal which Plaintiff disputes; it should reflect Appeal 13-16038, not this action.
10
The Litigation Coordinator is requested to address and request correction of this error in the
11
record keeping of Plaintiff’s inmate trust account transaction list. If Plaintiff has further questions
12
about this issue, he should contact the Kern Valley State Prison Litigation Coordinator.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for reimbursement of
13
14
incorrect filing fees, (Docs. 83, 84), are DENIED and the Clerk is ordered to send a copy of this
15
order to the Litigation Coordinator at Kern Valley State Prison for assistance in correcting the
16
erroneous second entry on the transaction list for Plaintiff’s inmate trust account attributed to this
17
case.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 30, 2018
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Court also notes that Plaintiff filed another appeal in this action, Appeal 12-15553, (see Docs. 17-20), but is
unaware whether that filing fee has been paid.
2 Plaintiff does not dispute withdrawal of the filing fee for Appeal 13-6298.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?