Fayad v. Alcantar et al.

Filing 10

ORDER Requiring Respondent to Inform the Court Whether Respondent Will Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/26/2010. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 NANCY ALCANTAR, et.al, 13 Respondents. 14 15 Petitioner is detained by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") and is 16 proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Petitioner is 17 represented by Love Macione, Esq. 18 Respondent has not indicated whether she will consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. 19 At this time, Respondent shall be required to notify the Clerk of Court in writing whether 20 or not Respondent will consent to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), using the forms supplied by the Clerk. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. 24 option form and the instructions for consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction; and 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 1 The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Respondent a copy of the consent / v. TAREQ ABU FAYAD, Petitioner, 1:10-cv-00070-DLB (HC) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO INFORM THE COURT WHETHER RESPONDENT WILL CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 ah0l4d 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Within seven (7) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent SHALL file with the Court a completed consent option form indicating consent or decline to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 26, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?