Hoban v. Goodlow, et al.

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/22/2010, CASE TRANSFERRRED to Sacramento Division. New Case Number 2:10-cv-3159-MCE-JFM.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Hoban v. Goodlow, et al. Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. /// /// TIMOTHY HOBAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CLAUDIA GOODLOW, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:10-cv-00074-GSA-PC ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Dated: 6i0kij November 22, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?