Hawecker et al v. Sorensen

Filing 80

ORDER Shortening Time On Hearing Plaintiffs' Motion Re:(1) Consolidating Related Cases (2) Vacating Amended Final Pretrial Order, and (3) Setting Consolidated Action For Scheduling Conference, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/14/2011. ( 77 Motion to Consolidate previously set for 5/16/2011 has been ADVANCED to 4/22/2011 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 CARRIE HAWECKER and MICHELLE BROUSSARD, 7 individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, 8 Plaintiffs, 9 10 11 12 vs. RAWLAND LEON SORENSEN, Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10-cv-00085 OWW JLT ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON HEARING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION RE: (1) CONSOLIDATING RELATED CASES (2) VACATING AMENDED FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER, AND (3) SETTING CONSOLIDATED ACTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Plaintiffs have filed an ex parte application seeking an order shortening time for the hearing on their motion to consolidate this action with the related case filed by the United States of America, United States v. Sorensen, Case No. 11-cv00511-OWW-GSA. Plaintiffs’ counsel’s accompanying declaration provides a satisfactory explanation for the need for the issuance of this order and for the failure of counsel to obtain a stipulation from other counsel or parties in the action. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate, etc. shall be heard on shortened time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). The hearing shall be on April 22, 2011 at 12:00p.m.. Any opposition to the motion shall be filed on or before April 20, 2011 before 12:00p.m... IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2011 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?