Muhammad v. Hartley

Filing 5

ORDER REQUIRING Petitioner to Submit Signed Declaration signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/25/2010. Petitioner to submit declaration by 7/21/2010. (Vasquez, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ABDUL MALIK MUHAMMAD, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-00094 MJS HC ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO SUBMIT SIGNED DECLARATION Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon examination of the petition, the Court has discovered that the petition does not contain an original signature. Local Rule 131 requires a document submitted to the Court for filing to include an original signature. In addition, Rule 2(c)(5) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a petition for writ of habeas corpus to "be signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner." In light of the difficulty in having Petitioner submit a new habeas corpus petition, Petitioner is ordered to submit a document stating that he submitted the instant petition to the Court and sign that document under penalty of perjury. -1The document must contain an 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia original signature. Petitioner is granted twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order to comply with the Court's directive. Petitioner is forewarned that failure to comply with a Court order may result in dismissal of the petition pursuant to Local Rule 110. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 June 25, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Michael J. Seng -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?