Miller v. Warden et al
Filing
27
ORDER Denying Motion For Entry Of Default (Doc. 25 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/6/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NORRIS DAJON MILLER,
10
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00112-SKO PC
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
WARDEN, et al.,
(Doc. 25)
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Norris Dajon Miller, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 23, 2010. On May
17
29, 2012, Plaintiff filed his third motion seeking the entry of default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).
18
As with the two previous motions, Plaintiff’s third motion lacks merit. The United States
19
Marshal was directed to initiate service of process on April 24, 2012. There is no evidence in the
20
record that Defendants waived service or were personally served and thereafter failed to file a timely
21
response. Until and unless Plaintiff is in receipt of such evidence, there is no basis for seeking entry
22
of default.
23
Plaintiff was previously warned that further filing of baseless requests for the entry of default
24
may lead to the imposition of sanctions against him. Plaintiff is now warned that if he files another
25
meritless motion, sanctions will be imposed against him.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
Plaintiff’s motion for the entry of default, filed on May 29, 2012, is HEREBY ORDERED
DENIED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
ie14hj
June 6, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?