Hudson v. Yates

Filing 18

ORDER Disregarding Petitioner's Motion For Leave To File "Memorandum Of Points And Authorities" (Doc. 11 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/21/2010. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 JAMES A. YATES, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. 17 Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus on January 11, 2010, in the 18 United States District Court for the Eastern for the Central District of California. (Court Doc. 1.) 19 The petition was transferred to this Court on January 21, 2010. (Court Doc. 3.) 20 On February 19, 2010, the Court directed Respondent to file a response to the Petition. 21 (Court Doc. 8.) 22 On March 8, 2010, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to file "Memorandum of Points and 23 Authorities" in support of his Petition. (Court Doc. 11.) It appears that Petitioner is under the 24 impression that further briefing in support of his petition is necessary. However, the Court has 25 directed Respondent to file answer or motion to dismiss the petition, and further briefing by 26 Petitioner is not necessary at this point. When Respondent files a response to the petition, 27 Petitioner may at that point file a reply. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's 28 1 / [Doc. 11] v. MARCO HUDSON, Petitioner, 1:10-cv-00125-AWI-SMS (HC) ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE "MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES" UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 motion to file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of tHe petition is DISREGARDED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 April 21, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?