Franklin v. United States

Filing 111

SECOND NOTICE of Non-Receipt of Witness Fees (Doc. 110 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/9/2014. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 EMERY I. FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 1:10-cv-00142-LJO-MJS (PC) SECOND NOTICE OF NON-RECEIPT OF WITNESS FEES v. (ECF No. 110) 15 16 UNITED STATES, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action. Trial is set for August 12, 2014. Plaintiff was advised that to subpoena unincarcerated witnesses to trial, he must submit, not later than May 16, 2014, money orders to cover witness fees. On March 31, 2014, the Court notified Plaintiff that fees for witnesses Holeman, 24 Ogues, Dean and Sahota had not been received. On April 7, 2014, Plaintiff responded that 25 his counselor had separately mailed the witness fees. (ECF No. 110.) 26 No such money orders have yet been received by the Court. No witness will be 27 subpoenaed unless and until the required money orders are actually received by the court. 28 If Plaintiff wishes to subpoena these witnesses, he must submit not later than May 1 1 16, 2014 money orders in the amounts previously specified. Without the money orders, no 2 subpoena will issue and no witness will be served by the United States Marshal. 3 This will be the Court’s final notice of the need and deadline for witness fees. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?