Franklin v. United States

Filing 127

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Certain Dates in Pre-Trial Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/25/14: Opposition to Motions in Limine, Trial Briefs and Original and five copies of all trial Exhibits along with exhibit lists to be submitted deadlines extended to August 6, 2014. All other dates and provisions of the Pre-Trial Order 119 shall remain unchanged. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant United States Attorney ALYSON A. BERG Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 (559) 497-4080 (telephone) (559) 497-4099 (facsimile) 7 8 Attorneys for the United States 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 EMERY L. FRANKLIN, III, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 16 17 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10-cv-00142-LJO-MJS-PC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER Trial: August 14, 2014 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 6 Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng Plaintiff Emery L. Franklin, III (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant United States of America (“United 18 States”) hereby stipulate to continue certain dates contained in the Pre-Trial Order [Dkt 119]. The 19 parties stipulate to continue the date on which to file their optional trial briefs and submit their 20 respective trial exhibits currently due on July 28, 2014 to August 6, 2014. The parties also stipulate to 21 continue the date by which to oppose any motions in limine from July 28, 2014 to August 6, 2014. 22 The parties base this stipulation on good cause as the Plaintiff, who is representing himself in 23 this action, has been in transit pursuant to the Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to 24 Transport Emery L. Franklin [Dkt 120] for the upcoming trial in this matter. As outlined in Plaintiff’s 25 Letter to the Judge [Dkt 124] filed July 16, 2014, Plaintiff began his transport from Lompoc, California 26 on Monday July 14, 2014. Plaintiff arrived in Fresno on Wednesday, July 23, 2014. The United States 27 arranged a trial exhibit conference on Thursday, July 24, 2014. At that time, the United States provided 28 Plaintiff with the United States’ motions in limine and agreed to provide: 1) a full and complete copy of 29 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER 30 1 1 Plaintiff’s exhibits for trial preparation; and 2) a full and complete copy of the United States’ trial 2 exhibits on or before July 25, 2014. 3 The parties request the court endorse this stipulation by way of formal order. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Current Date New Date Last day to file and serve any Opposition to Motions in Limine July 28, 2014 August 6, 2014 Optional Trial Briefs July 28, 2014 August 6, 2014 Original and five copies of all trial Exhibits along with exhibit lists to be submitted July 28, 2014 August 6, 2014 All other dates and provisions of the Pre-Trial Order [Dkt 119] shall remain unchanged. Respectfully submitted, 11 12 Dated: July 24, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 13 14 By: 15 16 17 /s/Jeffrey J. Lodge JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the United States Dated: July 24, 2014 18 19 /s/Emery L. Franklin III Emery L. Franklin III Plaintiff In Pro Per 20 21 ORDER 22 Having reviewed the stipulation submitted by the parties, the court continues the dates as 23 outlined above from July 28, 2014 to August 6, 2014. All other dates and provisions of the Pre-Trial 24 25 Order [Dkt 119] shall remain unchanged. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: July 25, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 29 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER 30 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER 30 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?