Franklin v. United States
Filing
127
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Certain Dates in Pre-Trial Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/25/14: Opposition to Motions in Limine, Trial Briefs and Original and five copies of all trial Exhibits along with exhibit lists to be submitted deadlines extended to August 6, 2014. All other dates and provisions of the Pre-Trial Order 119 shall remain unchanged. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JEFFREY J. LODGE
Assistant United States Attorney
ALYSON A. BERG
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
(559) 497-4080 (telephone)
(559) 497-4099 (facsimile)
7
8
Attorneys for the United States
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
EMERY L. FRANKLIN, III,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
15
16
17
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:10-cv-00142-LJO-MJS-PC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL
ORDER; ORDER
Trial: August 14, 2014
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 6
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng
Plaintiff Emery L. Franklin, III (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant United States of America (“United
18
States”) hereby stipulate to continue certain dates contained in the Pre-Trial Order [Dkt 119]. The
19
parties stipulate to continue the date on which to file their optional trial briefs and submit their
20
respective trial exhibits currently due on July 28, 2014 to August 6, 2014. The parties also stipulate to
21
continue the date by which to oppose any motions in limine from July 28, 2014 to August 6, 2014.
22
The parties base this stipulation on good cause as the Plaintiff, who is representing himself in
23
this action, has been in transit pursuant to the Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to
24
Transport Emery L. Franklin [Dkt 120] for the upcoming trial in this matter. As outlined in Plaintiff’s
25
Letter to the Judge [Dkt 124] filed July 16, 2014, Plaintiff began his transport from Lompoc, California
26
on Monday July 14, 2014. Plaintiff arrived in Fresno on Wednesday, July 23, 2014. The United States
27
arranged a trial exhibit conference on Thursday, July 24, 2014. At that time, the United States provided
28
Plaintiff with the United States’ motions in limine and agreed to provide: 1) a full and complete copy of
29
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER
30
1
1
Plaintiff’s exhibits for trial preparation; and 2) a full and complete copy of the United States’ trial
2
exhibits on or before July 25, 2014.
3
The parties request the court endorse this stipulation by way of formal order.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Current Date
New Date
Last day to file and serve any
Opposition to Motions in Limine
July 28, 2014
August 6, 2014
Optional Trial Briefs
July 28, 2014
August 6, 2014
Original and five copies of all trial
Exhibits along with exhibit lists to
be submitted
July 28, 2014
August 6, 2014
All other dates and provisions of the Pre-Trial Order [Dkt 119] shall remain unchanged.
Respectfully submitted,
11
12
Dated: July 24, 2014
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
13
14
By:
15
16
17
/s/Jeffrey J. Lodge
JEFFREY J. LODGE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for the United States
Dated: July 24, 2014
18
19
/s/Emery L. Franklin III
Emery L. Franklin III
Plaintiff In Pro Per
20
21
ORDER
22
Having reviewed the stipulation submitted by the parties, the court continues the dates as
23
outlined above from July 28, 2014 to August 6, 2014. All other dates and provisions of the Pre-Trial
24
25
Order [Dkt 119] shall remain unchanged.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated:
July 25, 2014
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
29
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER
30
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DATES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER; ORDER
30
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?