Franklin v. United States

Filing 151

ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Remit Witness Fee Payments to Trial Witness Ogues, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/10/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EMERY L. FRANKLIN, Case No. 1:10-cv-00142-MJS (PC) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO REMIT WITNESS FEE PAYMENTS TO TRIAL WITNESS OGUES 12 UNITED STATES, (ECF Nos. 141, 150) 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). Trial began on August 14, 2014 and judgment was entered in favor of Defendant, the United States, on August 15, 2014. Prior to trial, the United States Marshal was directed to serve upon Plaintiff’s trial witness, former BOP employee Mr. Ogues, a subpoena commanding appearance at trial and U.S. Treasury check #403031941548 in the amount of $113.45 covering witness fees. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45; 28 U.S.C. § 566(c). During trial the parties stipulated that Plaintiff would pay Mr. Ogues additional mileage costs of $116.39. (ECF No. 141.) Mr. Ogues appeared and testified at trial. On or about September 25, 2014, the Marshal returned to the Court the executed subpoena for Mr. Ogues along with the check covering his witness fees. (ECF No. 150.) On or about October 8, 2014, the Clerk received from Plaintiff U.S. Treasury check # 403036614310 payable to Rodrigo Ogues in the amount of $116.39. 1 1 2 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to remit the above checks to Mr. Orgues at the following address: 3 Mr. Ogues c/o United States Attorney’s Office Attn: Jeff Lodge 2500 Tulare Street Suite 4401 Fresno, CA 93721. 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 October 10, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?