Fonseca et al v. City of Fresno
Filing
81
ORDER After Settlement 80 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/15/12: Parties ORDERED to file appropriate dismissal/conclusion papers, no later than March 19, 2012. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GUADALUPE FONESCA, et al.,
10
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CASE NO. CV F 10-0147 LJO DLB
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 80.)
11
CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
____________________________/
14
The parties’ counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached. Pursuant to this
15
Court’s Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than March 19, 2012, to file
16
appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action
17
has not been dismissed.
18
19
This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the March 5, 2012 motions in
limine hearing and the March 20, 2012 trial.
20
Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or
21
parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court
22
ADMONISHES counsel that they are expected to observe and comply with the Federal Rules of Civil
23
Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems
24
appropriate.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
Dated:
February 15, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
66h44d
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?