Fonseca et al v. City of Fresno

Filing 81

ORDER After Settlement 80 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/15/12: Parties ORDERED to file appropriate dismissal/conclusion papers, no later than March 19, 2012. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GUADALUPE FONESCA, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, vs. CASE NO. CV F 10-0147 LJO DLB ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 80.) 11 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., 12 13 Defendants. ____________________________/ 14 The parties’ counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached. Pursuant to this 15 Court’s Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than March 19, 2012, to file 16 appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action 17 has not been dismissed. 18 19 This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the March 5, 2012 motions in limine hearing and the March 20, 2012 trial. 20 Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or 21 parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court 22 ADMONISHES counsel that they are expected to observe and comply with the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems 24 appropriate. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: February 15, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?