National Petrochemical & Refiners Association et al v. Goldstene et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING - Defendants shall file a responsive pleading by 3/31/2010. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/24/2010. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., State Bar No. 37100 Attorney General of California ROBERT W. BYRNE, State Bar No. 213155 Supervising Deputy Attorney General GAVIN G. MCCABE, State Bar No. 130864 MARK POOLE, State Bar No. 194520 Deputy Attorneys General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5582 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: Mark.Poole@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants James Goldstene, et al. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, THE CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY SECURITY, and THE CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board; MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING, KEN YEAGER, DORENE D'ADAMO, BARBARA RIORDAN, JOHN R. BALMES, LYDIA H. KENNARD, SANDRA BERG, RON ROBERTS, JOHN G. TELLES, and RONALD O. LOVERIDGE, in their official capacities as members of the California Air Resources Board; ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; and EDMUND G. BROWN JR. in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants. 1 CV-F-10-0163 LJO DLB STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING Action Filed: February 2, 2010 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING (CV-F-10-0163-LJO-DLB) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING (CV-F-10-0163-LJO-DLB) WHEREAS on February 2, 2010, Plaintiffs National Petrochemicals & Refiners Association, American Trucking Associations, The Center for North American Energy Security and The Consumer Energy Alliance (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed their Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in this matter. WHEREAS on February 3, 2010, by Order of the Court, the matter was reassigned to District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck pursuant to Local Rule 123(c) and assigned new Case No. CV-F-10-0163 LJO DLB. WHEREAS Defendants need additional time in order to prepare their responsive pleadings in this matter. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Defendants through their respective counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 143, that: Plaintiffs do not oppose Defendants' request for an extension of thirty (30) days within which to file their responsive pleading. Defendants' responsive pleading will now be due on March 31, 2010. Dated: February 24, 2010 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California By: ____/s/ Mark Poole _____________ MARK POOLE Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Dated: February 24, 2010 By: /s/ Marie L. Fiala___________ MARIE L. FIALA Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants James N. Goldstene, et al., are granted an extension of thirty (30) days for the filing of their responsive pleading. Defendants' responsive pleading shall be due on March 31, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: DEAC_Signatu re -END: February 24, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3b142a 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING (CV-F-10-0163-LJO-DLB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?