Brown v. Pickett et al
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion 21 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/23/11. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
ALFRED BROWN,
CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00167-AWI-DLB PC
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
11
v.
12
CHARLES D. PICKETT, et al.,
(DOC. 21)
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
Plaintiff Alfred Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this
17
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for the
18
Court to order Pleasant Valley State Prison to release his property. Doc. 20. The Court treats the
19
motion as one for preliminary injunction. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
20
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On August 4, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was
22
served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and
23
Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. Doc. 21. Plaintiff did not file a timely
24
Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de
26
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
27
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 4, 2011, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to order Pleasant Valley State Prison to release his
4
5
6
7
property, filed June 28, 2011, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
0m8i78
December 23, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?