Aaron v. Abdou et al

Filing 14

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 5/2/2013 recommending that 5 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 6/6/2013. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE L. AARON, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. Case No. 1:10-cv-00178-AWI-SAB (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PHYSICIAN S. ABDOU, et al., (ECF Nos. 5 & 13.) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff George L. Aaron, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner appearing pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 15, 2013, the Court issued an order 19 dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint, with leave to amend, for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 13.) 20 Plaintiff was given thirty days to amend his complaint and was cautioned that the failure to do so 21 would result in the dismissal of this action, with prejudice. More than thirty days has passed and 22 Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is 23 no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 24 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY 25 RECOMMENDED that this action BE DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure 26 to state any claims upon which relief may be granted. 27 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 1 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections 2 with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 3 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 4 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 5 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 May 2, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 10 427h8ijefekbei 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?