Rizzo v. Diaz et al

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING Motion to Seal Filed Documents 4 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/16/10. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Rizzo v. Diaz et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PIERRE RIZZO, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 M. DIAZ, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Pierre Rizzo ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Filed Documents [ECF No. 4] asking the Court seal all documents filed in the above-captioned action. Plaintiff alleges that the mexican mafia has a "hit out" on him that threatens the safety of his family and, therefore, the Court should seal all filings in this case. Absent compelling justification, filings in cases such as this are a matter of public record. United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 1012 (9th Cir. 2008). The complaint in this action involves allegations that the Defendant prison guards were contaminating Plaintiff's food. The Court does not see anything in the allegations that might involve Plaintiff's family or expose Plaintiff's family to harm. Nothing filed thus far in the case involves personal information or information that is sensitive in nature. Defendants have not yet filed anything. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Filed Documents [ECF No. 4] is DENIED. If, (ECF No. 4) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 1:10-cv-180-LJO-MJS (PC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 as this litigation progresses, Plaintiff believes that a particular document reveals sensitive information that warrants it being filed under seal, he is free to so move as to that particular document. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 July 16, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Michael J. Seng -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?