Salcido v. Madera County et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/10/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BRUCE W. NICKERSON, C.B.N. 90760 231 Manor Drive San Carlos, CA 94070 Tel: (650) 594-0195 Facsimile: (650) 596-0595 6 K. MARK MEKHITARIAN 5588 N. Palm Ave. Fresno, CA 93704 Tel: (559) 439-1045 Facsimile: (888) 592-6941 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff JACOB SALCIDO, a minor 5 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 10 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JEANINE SALCIDO, guardian ad litem for J.S., a minor, Plaintiff, 13 14 NO. 1:10-cv-00195-AWI-DLB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER v. 15 DEPUTY JEFFERY THOMAS #10321; SARGEANT PATRICK MAJESKI #8484; 16 Defendants. Trial Date: October 30, 2012 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 1:10-cv-00195-AWI-DLB IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 1 2 designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and pursuant to the Settlement Agreement entered into 4 between the parties, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 6 Dated: October 9, 2012 7 By: /s/ Bruce W. Nickerson Bruce W. Nickerson Attorney for Plaintiff Jacob Salcido 8 9 10 11 Dated: October 10, 2012 COTA COLE LLP 12 By: /s/ Carolyn J. Frank Dennis M. Cota Carolyn J. Frank Jonathan E. Miller Attorneys for Defendants DEPUTY JEFFREY THOMAS and SERGEANT PATRICK MAJESKI 13 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER 19 The parties to this action, having stipulated through their designated counsel, the above- 20 21 captioned action shall be and hereby is DISMISSED, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of 22 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 27 28 0m8i788 -1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 1:10-cv-00195-AWI-DLB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?