Delgado v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION for DISMISSAL and ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/2/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Bradley, A)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tanya Levinson Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 N. Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) No. 1:10-cv-00218-OWW-DLB DANIEL DELGADO, ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER vs. ) OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED, et ) ) al., ) Complaint Filed February 10, 2010 ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff Daniel Delgado, through his attorney, Tanya Levinson Moore, Moore Law Firm, P.C., San Jose, California, Defendants OfficeMax Incorporated and Clovis Market Place L.P., through their attorneys Littler Mendelson and David S. Pearson, hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Date: April 2, 2010 /s/Tanya Levinson Moore Tanya E. Levinson Moore Attorney for Plaintiff

Delgado v. OfficeMax Inc., et al. Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 1 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Date: April 2, 2010 /s/ Michele Z. Stevenson Michele Z. Stevenson LITTLER MENDELSON Attorneys for Defendant OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED Date: April 2, 2010 /s/ David S. Pearson David S. Pearson LAW OFFICES OF DAVID PEARSON Attorneys for Defendant CLOVIS MARKET PLACE, L.P. ORDER THE PARTIES HAVING SO STIPULATED, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
DEAC_Signature-END:

April 2, 2010

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

emm0d64h

Delgado v. OfficeMax Inc., et al. Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 2 1