Rivera v. Mendoza-Powers

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/3/2010 denying as moot 36 MOTION to vacate the stay and direct the filing of a response to the petition. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(HC) Rivera v. Hartley Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 v. 13 JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 that was transferred to this Court from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge FRANK RIVERA, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv--00223-SMS-HC ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE STAY AND DIRECT THE FILING OF A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION (Doc. 36) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion to vacate a stay and to direct the filing of a response to the petition. By order filed on July 22, 2010, this Court denied Petitioner's motion for a stay and directed the Respondent to file a response to the petition. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vacate a stay and direct the filing of a response is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 August 3, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?