Colbert v. Chavez et al

Filing 16

ORDER Adopting 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 14 Motion for for Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/29/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GEORGE K. COLBERT, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00250-AWI-GBC (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. (Doc. 15) 12 P. CHAVEZ, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 I. 16 Plaintiff George K. Colbert (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed 18 a motion for injunctive relief to provide emergency medical treatment to prevent Plaintiff from 19 becoming paralyzed. (Doc. 14). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 1, 2011, filed a Findings and 21 Recommendations herein which was served on Plaintiff which contained notice that any objections 22 to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (Doc. 15). As to date 23 Plaintiff has not filed any objections. Procedural History 24 II. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 26 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 27 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 Conclusion and Order Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, filed 1 1 January 18, 2011, is DENIED. (Doc. 14) 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: 0m8i78 September 29, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?