Moore v. Sandoval, et al

Filing 26

Stipulation for Dismissal; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/23/2010. CASE CLOSED.(Verduzco, M)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tanya Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 N. Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) No. 1:10-CV-00268 SKO RONALD MOORE, ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER vs. ) ) VINCENT SANDOVAL, SAM ) SANDOVAL, ELIZABETH ) Assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge SANDOVAL, ) ) SHEILA K. OBERTO ) Defendants. ) Complaint Filed February 17, 2010 ) ) ) Plaintiff Ronald Moore, through his attorney, Tanya Moore, Moore Law Firm, P.C., San Jose, California, and Defendants Vincent Sandoval, Sam Sandoval and Elizabeth Sandoval through their attorney, The Reich Law Firm, Jeff Reich, Esq., Fresno, California, hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Date: August 23, 2010 /s/Tanya Moore, Esq. Tanya Moore Attorney for Plaintiff

Moore v. Vincent Sandoval., et al, Stipulation and Order for Dismissal

Page 1 1

Date: August 23, 2010
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Moore v. Vincent Sandoval., et al, Stipulation and Order for Dismissal
DEAC_Signature-END:

THE REICH LAW FIRM /s/Jeff Reich, Esq. Jeff Reich Attorney for Defendants, Vincent Sandoval, Sam Sandoval And Elizabeth Sandoval ORDER

THE PARTIES HAVING SO STIPULATED, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

August 23, 2010

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ie14hje

Page 2 1