Hamilton v. Hart et al

Filing 43

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 41 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/9/2014. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

DENNIS L. HAMILTON,

7

8
9

Plaintiff,
vs.
JOHN HART, et al.,

10

Defendants.

1:10-cv-00272-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT
OF NON-OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
(Doc. 41.)

11
12

On April 29, 2014, defendants Hart, Phillips, Bogle, Prouty, Ronquillo, Llamas, Trupe,

13

Castro, and Ocampo (“Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that

14

Plaintiff failed to timely and properly exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 41.) Plaintiff

15

was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-

16

one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).

17

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

18

1.

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file

19

an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion for

20

summary judgment; and

21

2.

22

If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with
prejudice, for failure to obey the court=s order and failure to prosecute.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 9, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE