Gracia v. Haws
Filing
33
ORDER STRIKING Petitioner's 32 Motion for Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/16/2012. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
ROBERT MEJIA GRACIA,
1:10-CV-00273 GSA HC
13
Petitioner,
ORDER STRIKING PETITIONER'S
MOTION FOR COURT ORDER
14
v.
15
[Doc. #32]
F. HAWS, Warden,
16
Respondent.
17
/
18
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties voluntarily consented to exercise of Magistrate Judge
20
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
21
On June 6, 2011, the undersigned issued an order denying the petition and entering judgment.
22
Petitioner filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; however, the appeal was
23
denied on October 25, 2011.
24
On October 21, 2011, Petitioner filed a motion for a court order directing the Clerk of Court
25
to provide Petitioner with a copy of his petition. On October 31, 2011, the Court denied the motion.
26
Petitioner was advised that such a request must be directed to the Clerk of the Court. He was further
27
advised that copies of documents are not provided free of charge, and that copies up to twenty (20)
28
U .S. D istrict C ourt
E. D . C alifornia
cd
1
1
pages may be made by the Clerk’ office at a charge of $.50 per page, but larger copy orders should
2
be directed to a copy service.
3
On March 12, 2012, Petitioner filed another motion for a court order granting him a copy of
4
his habeas corpus petition. For the same reasons expressed in the order of October 31, 2011, the
5
motion is STRICKEN. Petitioner is advised that this case is closed, and any future filings will
6
likewise be stricken.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
6i0kij
July 16, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
U .S. D istrict C ourt
E. D . C alifornia
cd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?