Macias v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/28/2011 granting 44 Stipulation to Dismiss Pfizer, Inc. (Lundstrom, T)
6
Pamela J. Yates (SBN 137440)
E-mail: pyates@kayescholer.com
Wendy S. Dowse (SBN 261224)
E-mail: wdowse@kayescholer.com
Julie Belezzuoli (SBN 267302)
E-mail: julie.belezzuoli@kayescholer.com
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1700
Los Angeles, California 90067-6048
Telephone: (310) 788-1000
Facsimile: (310) 788-1200
7
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
(FRESNO)
12
13
14
15
16
LUCILLE MACIAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
PFIZER INC, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:10-cv-0282-JRG-DLB
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PFIZER INC
20
21
22
The Court having considered the stipulation by the parties in this action, and
finding good cause therefore;
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
24
1.
Pfizer Inc (“Pfizer”) is dismissed from this action with prejudice.
25
2.
Plaintiff may move to amend her complaint to add Pharmacia &
26
Upjohn Company LLC (“Upjohn”) as a defendant. Pfizer and Wyeth LLC will not
27
object to Plaintiff’s motion to the extent it seeks to add Upjohn as a defendant.
28
3.
During the trial of this action, the parties shall not refer to Pfizer.
Macias - Proposed Order re Pfizer Stip.DOCXORDER GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION TO DISMISS PFIZER INC
1
4.
Pfizer guarantees payment of any final judgment that may be rendered
2
against Upjohn in this matter, and consents to the jurisdiction of this Court for the
3
purpose of enforcing any such judgment.
4
5
5.
This stipulation shall not be admissible in evidence, except in an action
to enforce its terms.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: December 28, 2011
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Macias - Proposed Order re Pfizer Stip.DOCXORDER GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION TO DISMISS PFIZER INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?