Guinn v. Sturm et al

Filing 57

STIPULATION and ORDER for CONTINUANCE of hearing. The Status Conference currently set for 4/26/2012, is CONTINUED to 6/26/2012, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/24/2012. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JAMES H. WATKINS, ESQ. #84571 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES H. WATKINS 49370 Road 426, Suite A P.O. Box 1793 Oakhurst, CA 93644 Telephone (559) 683-5757 and Facsimile (559) 683-7945 4 5 Attorney for Petitioner, PAULO EUGENE GUINN 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 PAULO EUGENE GUINN, 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 15 16 J. STURM, A. BIGHAM, Mariposa County Deputy Sheriffs, BRIAN MULLER, Mariposa County Sheriff, COUNTY OF MARIPOSA, CALIFORNIA 17 18 Defendants. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00320-LJO-SKO STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND ORDER THEREON Old Date: New Date: Time: Court Room: April 26, 2012 June 26, 2012 9:30 a.m. 7 19 20 21 WHEREAS, additional time is required for negotiation re MediCare and MediCal liens; 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of 23 record that the Status Conference currently set for April 26, 2012, be continued to June 26, 2012, at 24 9:30 a.m. in Court Room 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto of the above entitled 25 court. 26 27 Dated: April 23, 2012 /s/ JAMES H. WATKINS_____________ JAMES H. WATKINS, ESQ., Attorney for Plaintiff 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND ORDER THEREON 1 1 Dated: April 23, 2012 /s/ KIMBERLY FLORES KIMBERLY FLORES, Attorney for Defendants 2 3 4 5 ORDER 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj April 24, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND ORDER THEREON 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?