Garcia v. Gordon Trucking, Inc. et al

Filing 89

ORDER reset deadlines, signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/29/2011. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bradley A. Silva (SBN 109423) bsilva@sbcglobal.net LAW OFFICES OF BRADLEY A. SILVA 8050 North Palm Avenue, Suite 300 Fresno, CA 93711 Tel. 559-446-2000 Fax 559-446-2004 Adam C. Smedstad, Pro Hac Vice asmedstad@scopelitis.com SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C. 30 West Monroe Street, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60603-2427 Tel. 312-225-7200 Fax 312-422-1224 James H. Hanson, Pro Hac Vice jhanson@scopelitis.com Angela S. Cash, Pro Hac Vice acash@scopelitis.com Andrew J. Butcher, Pro Hac Vice abutcher@scopelitis.com SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY 10 West Market Street, Suite 1500 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2968 Tel. 317-637-1777 Fax 317-687-2414 Daniel R. Barney, Pro Hac Vice dbarney@scopelitis.com SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, PC 1850 M Street, N.W., Suite 280 Washington, DC 20036-5804 (202) 783-9222 Fax: (202) 783-9230 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION SIMON V. GARCIA and ROY VAN KEMPEN on ) behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a California ) Corporation, which will transact business in ) California as L GORDON; STEVE GORDON, ) an individual; BOB GOLDBERG, an individual; and ) Does 1 through 20, ) Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) CHRISTOPHER YANEZ and EMMA YANEZ on ) behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a Washington ) corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Case No. 1:10-cv-00324-OWW-SKO ORDER Case No. 1:10-cv-00324-OWW-SKO ORDER 1 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs’ Motion for 2 Partial Summary Judgment is removed from the September 19, 2011 Motion Calendar and reset 3 to October 3, 2011. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 4 is now due on September 19, 2011 and Plaintiffs’ Reply is due on September 26, 2011. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 7 8 Date: August 29, 2011 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Case No. 1:10-cv-00324-OWW-SKO ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?