Garcia v. Gordon Trucking, Inc. et al
Filing
89
ORDER reset deadlines, signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/29/2011. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Bradley A. Silva (SBN 109423)
bsilva@sbcglobal.net
LAW OFFICES OF BRADLEY A. SILVA
8050 North Palm Avenue, Suite 300
Fresno, CA 93711
Tel. 559-446-2000
Fax 559-446-2004
Adam C. Smedstad, Pro Hac Vice
asmedstad@scopelitis.com
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT,
HANSON & FEARY, P.C.
30 West Monroe Street, Suite 600
Chicago, IL 60603-2427
Tel. 312-225-7200
Fax 312-422-1224
James H. Hanson, Pro Hac Vice
jhanson@scopelitis.com
Angela S. Cash, Pro Hac Vice
acash@scopelitis.com
Andrew J. Butcher, Pro Hac Vice
abutcher@scopelitis.com
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT,
HANSON & FEARY
10 West Market Street, Suite 1500
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2968
Tel. 317-637-1777
Fax 317-687-2414
Daniel R. Barney, Pro Hac Vice
dbarney@scopelitis.com
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT,
HANSON & FEARY, PC
1850 M Street, N.W., Suite 280
Washington, DC 20036-5804
(202) 783-9222
Fax: (202) 783-9230
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION
SIMON V. GARCIA and ROY VAN KEMPEN on )
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a California
)
Corporation, which will transact business in
)
California as L GORDON; STEVE GORDON,
)
an individual; BOB GOLDBERG, an individual; and )
Does 1 through 20,
)
Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
CHRISTOPHER YANEZ and EMMA YANEZ on )
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, )
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a Washington )
corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Case No. 1:10-cv-00324-OWW-SKO
ORDER
Case No. 1:10-cv-00324-OWW-SKO
ORDER
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs’ Motion for
2
Partial Summary Judgment is removed from the September 19, 2011 Motion Calendar and reset
3
to October 3, 2011. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
4
is now due on September 19, 2011 and Plaintiffs’ Reply is due on September 26, 2011.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED:
7
8
Date: August 29, 2011
/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER
9
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Case No. 1:10-cv-00324-OWW-SKO
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?