Ransom v. Gonzalez et al
Filing
10
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Extension of Time in which to File Amended Complaint; Amended Complaint Due in Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/10/2012. Amended Complaint due by 6/12/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LEONARD RANSOM, JR.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DANIEL GONZALES, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
1:10-cv-00397 GSA PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH
TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE IN
THIRTY DAYS
12
13
14
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Plaintiff has
consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
15
On April 5, 2012, an order was entered, directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint
16
by April 30, 2012. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, indicating that
17
he has been transferred to CSP Lancaster. It appears that Plaintiff did not receive the April 5,
18
2012, order.
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
20
1. The Clerk’s Office shall re-serve the April 5, 2012, order upon Plaintiff at his address
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of record.
2. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time of thirty days from the date of service of this
order in which to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order of April 5, 2012, order.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated:
6i0kij
May 10, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?