Ransom v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Extension of Time in which to File Amended Complaint; Amended Complaint Due in Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/10/2012. Amended Complaint due by 6/12/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LEONARD RANSOM, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DANIEL GONZALES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:10-cv-00397 GSA PC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 12 13 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 15 On April 5, 2012, an order was entered, directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint 16 by April 30, 2012. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, indicating that 17 he has been transferred to CSP Lancaster. It appears that Plaintiff did not receive the April 5, 18 2012, order. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. The Clerk’s Office shall re-serve the April 5, 2012, order upon Plaintiff at his address 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of record. 2. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time of thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order of April 5, 2012, order. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: 6i0kij May 10, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?