Ransom v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 126

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 124 ; ORDER GRANTING Defendant Sandoval's Motion for Summary Judgment 110 ; ORDER ENTERING Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendant Sandoval; and ORDER for This Case to Proceed Against Defendants Amado r, Nava, Marquez, and Nunez for Use of Excessive Force; and Against Defendants Nava, Marquez and Ybarra for Failure to Protect Plaintiff, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/25/16: This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LEONARD RANSOM, JR.,

11
12
13
14

1:10-cv-00397-AWI-EPG-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 124.)

vs.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
SANDOVAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(ECF No. 110.)

R. MARQUEZ, et al.,
Defendants.

15

ORDER ENTERING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT
SANDOVAL

16
17

ORDER FOR THIS CASE TO PROCEED
AGAINST DEFENDANTS AMADOR,
NAVA, MARQUEZ, AND NUNEZ FOR
USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE; AND
AGAINST DEFENDANTS NAVA,
MARQUEZ, AND YBARRA FOR
FAILURE TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Leonard Ransom (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights

25

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

26

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

27

On December 2, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

28

defendant Sandoval’s motion for summary judgment be granted. (ECF No. 110.) The parties
1

1

were granted twenty days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations.

2

(Id.) The twenty-day deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed.

3

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

4

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

5

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

6

analysis.

7

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

8

1.

9
10

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on
December 2, 2015, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2.

11

Defendant Sandoval’s motion for summary judgment, filed on July 31, 2015, is
GRANTED;

12

3.

Summary judgment is entered in favor of defendant Sandoval;

13

4.

This case now proceeds against defendants Amador, Nava, Marquez, and Nunez

14

for use of excessive force; and against defendants Nava, Marquez, and Ybarra

15

for failure to protect Plaintiff;

16

5.

17
18

The Clerk is directed to reflect on the Court’s docket that the claims against
defendant Sandoval are resolved; and

6.

This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 25, 2016
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2