Tracy Taylor v. Hubbard et al

Filing 46

ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Letter To The Court (ECF No. 45 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/25/2012. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TRACY TAYLOR, 10 CASE NO. 1:10-cv–00404-BAM PC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S LETTER TO THE COURT v. (ECF No. 45) 12 SUSAN HUBBARD, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Tracy Taylor is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on March 8, 2010. An order 17 issued on November 15, 2011, finding the first amended complaint stated claims against Defendants 18 Harrington and Wegman, and Defendants have been served. On March 23, 2012, Plaintiff filed a 19 motion to amend his compliant. On April 2, 2012, the court granted Defendants motion to extend 20 time to respond to the complaint until the court granted or denied Plaintiff’s motion to amend. On 21 April 23, 2012, Plaintiff filed a letter to the court stating that he has been retaliated against by being 22 transferred from Kern Valley State Prison. Plaintiff is advised that a document requesting a court 23 order must be styled as a motion, not a letter. The motion should state, as clearly as possible, the 24 relief sought. 25 It is unclear what action, if any, Plaintiff seeks in the letter filed April 23, 2012. Thus, 26 Plaintiff’s letter shall be disregarded. To the extent that Plaintiff wishes the court to take any action, 27 Plaintiff must file a motion requesting the desired relief. 28 /// 1 1 2 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s letter, filed April 23, 2012, is disregarded, as it appears to the court that no action is requested. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: cm411 April 25, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?