E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Proximo Spirits, Inc. et al

Filing 237

STIPULATION and ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on January 4, 2012. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 D. GREG DURBIN (SBN 81749) McCORMICK BARSTOW SHEPPARD WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 River Park Place East P.O. Box 28912 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Greg.Durbin@mccormickbarstow.com D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712) NAOMI JANE GRAY (SBN 230171) MATTHEW A. STRATTON (SBN 254080) HARVEY SISKIND LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 pharvey@harveysiskind.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery and Counterdefendants Ecco Domani USA, Inc. and Tequila Supremo, S.A. de C.V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROXIMO SPIRITS, INC., a Delaware corporation; AGAVERA CAMICHINES, S.A. DE C.V., a Mexico corporation; and DOES 1-25, Hearing Date: January 24, 2012 Time: 8:30 a.m. Before: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill Defendants. 23 24 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”), Counterdefendants Tequila Supremo, S.A. de C.V. and Ecco Domani USA, Inc. (collectively, “Counterdefendants”), and -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT 1 Defendants and Counterclaimants Proximo Spirits, Inc. (“Proximo”) and Agavera Camichines, S.A. 2 de C.V. (“Agavera Camichines”) (collectively, “Counterclaimants”), through their respective 3 counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS the parties filed motions for summary judgment on December 9, 2011, and 5 WHEREAS the parties’ papers opposing each others’ motions for summary judgment are 6 currently due on January 10, 2012, and 7 WHEREAS the parties agree that additional time to prepare reply briefs on the pending 8 motions would be beneficial to both sides, and both sides are willing to create that additional time, 9 while retaining the existing deadline for reply briefs, by advancing the filing date for opposition 10 papers. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT 12 1. 13 14 15 The parties’ papers opposing each others’ motions for summary judgment shall be filed and served on January 6, 2011. 2. The deadline for the parties to file and serve their reply papers in further support of their own motions for summary judgment shall be unchanged, i.e., it shall remain January 17, 2012. 16 17 Respectfully submitted, DATED: December 29, 2011 18 19 McCORMICK BARSTOW LLP D. GREGORY DURBIN HARVEY SISKIND LLP D. PETER HARVEY NAOMI JANE GRAY MATTHEW A. STRATTON DONALD A. THOMPSON 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ D. Peter Harvey 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff, E. & J. Gallo Winery 25 26 DATED: December 29, 2011 SIERRA IP GROUP MARK D. MILLER 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT 2 ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB MICHAEL ASCHEN ANTHONY A. COPPOLA 3 By: 1 /s/ Anthony A. Coppola 4 Attorneys for Defendants, Proximo Spirits, Inc., and Agavera Camichines, S.A. de C.V.. 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill January 4, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signatur ND: e-E b9ed48bb 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?