E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Proximo Spirits, Inc. et al
Filing
237
STIPULATION and ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on January 4, 2012. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
D. GREG DURBIN (SBN 81749)
McCORMICK BARSTOW SHEPPARD
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
5 River Park Place East
P.O. Box 28912
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone: (559) 433-1300
Facsimile: (559) 433-2300
Greg.Durbin@mccormickbarstow.com
D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712)
NAOMI JANE GRAY (SBN 230171)
MATTHEW A. STRATTON (SBN 254080)
HARVEY SISKIND LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 354-0100
Facsimile: (415) 391-7124
pharvey@harveysiskind.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery
and Counterdefendants Ecco Domani USA, Inc. and Tequila Supremo, S.A. de C.V.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PROXIMO SPIRITS, INC., a Delaware
corporation; AGAVERA CAMICHINES, S.A.
DE C.V., a Mexico corporation; and DOES 1-25,
Hearing Date: January 24, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Before: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
Defendants.
23
24
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”), Counterdefendants Tequila
Supremo, S.A. de C.V. and Ecco
Domani USA, Inc. (collectively, “Counterdefendants”), and
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT
1
Defendants and Counterclaimants Proximo Spirits, Inc. (“Proximo”) and Agavera Camichines, S.A.
2
de C.V. (“Agavera Camichines”) (collectively, “Counterclaimants”), through their respective
3
counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
WHEREAS the parties filed motions for summary judgment on December 9, 2011, and
5
WHEREAS the parties’ papers opposing each others’ motions for summary judgment are
6
currently due on January 10, 2012, and
7
WHEREAS the parties agree that additional time to prepare reply briefs on the pending
8
motions would be beneficial to both sides, and both sides are willing to create that additional time,
9
while retaining the existing deadline for reply briefs, by advancing the filing date for opposition
10
papers.
11
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT
12
1.
13
14
15
The parties’ papers opposing each others’ motions for summary judgment shall be
filed and served on January 6, 2011.
2.
The deadline for the parties to file and serve their reply papers in further support of
their own motions for summary judgment shall be unchanged, i.e., it shall remain January 17, 2012.
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: December 29, 2011
18
19
McCORMICK BARSTOW LLP
D. GREGORY DURBIN
HARVEY SISKIND LLP
D. PETER HARVEY
NAOMI JANE GRAY
MATTHEW A. STRATTON
DONALD A. THOMPSON
20
21
22
23
By:
/s/ D. Peter Harvey
24
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
E. & J. Gallo Winery
25
26
DATED: December 29, 2011
SIERRA IP GROUP
MARK D. MILLER
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT
2
ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB
MICHAEL ASCHEN
ANTHONY A. COPPOLA
3
By:
1
/s/ Anthony A. Coppola
4
Attorneys for Defendants,
Proximo Spirits, Inc., and
Agavera Camichines, S.A. de C.V..
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
January 4, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signatur ND:
e-E
b9ed48bb
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?