Griggs v. Tulare District Hospital et al
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER to extension of time to answer complaint; signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/18/2010. (Response due by 6/28/2010)(Kusamura, W)
8244.30194
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DENNIS G. MCCARTHY (Bar No. 118178) FENTON & KELLER A Professional Corporation 2801 Monterey-Salinas Highway Post Office Box 791 Monterey, CA 93942 Telephone: 831-373-1241 Facsimile: 831-373-7219 Attorneys for Defendant TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISMA GRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, a public entity, MICHAEL BULLOCK, an individual (as to GC §12940 only), and CRAIG TANAKA, an individual (as to GC §12940 only), Defendants.
CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00412-OWW-GSA STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND ORDER [Pursuant to Local Rule 144(Fed. R. Civ. P6)] Date of Filing: March 8, 2010
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto to their respective counsel of record that Defendant TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL's time to respond to the Complaint is extended to June 28, 2010. /// /// /// /// /// /// ///
H:\documents\srj.2tk7vwi.doc
FENTON & KELLER
ATTOR N EYS AT L AW M ON T ER E Y
STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
FENTON & KELLER
ATTOR N EYS AT L AW M ON T ER E Y
Dated: June 11, 2010
FENTON & KELLER
By:
/s/ Dennis G. McCarthy Attorneys for Defendant TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL
Dated: June 11, 2010
W.J. SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By:
/s/ William J. Smith Attorneys for Plaintiff CHRISMA GRIGGS
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
DEAC_Signature-END:
June 18, 2010
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
emm0d64h
H:\documents\srj.2tk7vwi.doc
-2-
STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?