Fahie v. CSATF Corcoran Appeals Office et al
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of 22 Action for Failure to State a Claim; Objections Due within Twenty-One Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/6/2011. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 6/2/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 ANTONIO FAHIE,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00415-AWI-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
v.
13 CSATF CORCORAN APPEALS OFFICE, et
al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
(DOC. 22)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
Findings And Recommendation
18 I.
Background
19
Plaintiff Antonio Fahie (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
20 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma
21 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 9, 2010, Plaintiff
22 initiated this action by filing his complaint. Doc. 1. On December 3, 2010, the Court dismissed
23 Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Doc. 21. Plaintiff was provided leave to file an
24 amended complaint. On December 13, 2010, Plaintiff filed his first amended complaint. Doc.
25 22.
26
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a
27 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The
28 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are
1
1 legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or
2 that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C.
3 § 1915A(b)(1),(2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been
4 paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or
5 appeal . . . fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. §
6 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
7
A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
8 pleader is entitled to relief . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are not
9 required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
10 conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009) (citing
11 Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). Plaintiff must set forth “sufficient factual
12 matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Twombly,
13 550 U.S. at 555). While factual allegations are accepted as true, legal conclusions are not. Id.
14 II.
Summary Of Amended Complaint
15
Plaintiff was previously incarcerated at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility
16 (“SATF”) in Corcoran, California, where the events giving rise to this action occurred. Plaintiff
17 names as Defendants: Wiggens, Smith, and Escobar, correctional counselor I at SATF.
18
Plaintiff alleges the following. Plaintiff’s due process rights were violated when
19 Defendants failed to properly file Plaintiff’s 602 inmate grievance, seeking to stop any move to a
20 prison located in the San Joaquin Valley. Plaintiff contends that any prison in the San Joaquin
21 Valley has valley fever.
22
Plaintiff requests as relief an injunction preventing any transfer to a prison in the San
23 Joaquin Valley which has valley fever.
24 III.
Analysis
25
Prisoners have a constitutional right to file inmate grievances. Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d
26 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 566 (9th Cir. 2005), and
27 Bruce v. Ylst, 351 F.3d 1283, 1288 (9th Cir. 2003)). However, prisoners do not have a due
28 process right for a specific inmate grievance procedure, as prisoners have no such liberty interest.
2
1 Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing Mann v. Adams, 855 F.2d 639, 640
2 (9th Cir. 1988)). Even assuming that Defendants were responsible for the processing of
3 Plaintiff’s inmate grievances, Plaintiff fails to state a claim.1 Plaintiff does not allege that
4 Defendants prevented him from filing, only that they did not respond to his grievance. There is
5 no due process violation for not treating Plaintiff’s grievance in a specific manner. Additionally,
6 prisoners have no liberty interest in avoiding transfer to another prison. Meachum v. Fano, 427
7 U.S. 215, 225-27 (1976).
8
Plaintiff vaguely alleges some sort of harm if he is transferred to a prison in the San
9 Joaquin Valley. Vague assertions of injury are insufficient to state a claim. Plaintiff must set
10 forth sufficient factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. Moss v. U.S.
11 Secret Service, 572 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1949-50).
12 IV.
Conclusion And Recommendation
13
Plaintiff fails to state a claim against any Defendants. Plaintiff was previously provided
14 with an opportunity to amend his complaint to cure the deficiencies identified, but was unable to
15 do so. The Court does not find that Plaintiff will be able to plead additional facts to cure the
16 deficiencies in his amended complaint. Accordingly, further leave to amend will not be granted.
17 See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).
18
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
19
1.
20
This action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted; and
21
2.
This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
22
These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District
23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty24 one (21) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, the Plaintiff may
25 file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to
26 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
27
1
28
It is unclear whether Defendants are actually responsible for screening Plaintiff’s inmate appeal. Appeals
coordinators are typically Correctional Counselor II. See Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.5(a).
3
1 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
2 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 6, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?