Lau v. Deukmejian

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, document 17 ; order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/30/2011. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HON LAU, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, et.al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10cv0421 AWI DLB ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Document 17) 16 Plaintiff Hon Lau (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the this action on 17 March 8, 2010. The Court determined that the complaint was frivolous and without merit and 18 denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis on March 29, 2010. The Court also 19 dismissed the action as duplicative and entered judgment on March 29, 2010. 20 On April 9, 2010, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. The Court denied Plaintiff’s request 21 to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, finding that his appeal was not taken in good faith. On 22 July 15, 2010, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal. 23 Plaintiff has continued to file notices of address changes in this action. His most recent 24 address change, dated August 29, 2011, includes the phrase “Motion for Reconsideration” in the 25 caption. However, the document only cites a new address and contains no other information. To 26 the extent Plaintiff attempts to challenge any orders in this action, his motion is DENIED. 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 Plaintiff is also advised that this action is closed and he does not need to continue to update his address. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a August 30, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?