Garcia v. Clark, et al.
Filing
163
ORDER DISMISSING MOTIONS AS MOOT re 102 , 103 , 104 , 108 , 121 , 123 , 143 , 144 , 144 , 147 , 149 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/6/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM P. GARCIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 1:10-cv-00447 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DISMISSING MOTIONS AS
MOOT
v.
[ECF Nos. 102, 103, 104, 108, 121, 123, 143,
144, 147, 149]
KEN CLARK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff William P. Garcia, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
18 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March 12, 2010.
19
On December 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
20 recommended Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction be
21 GRANTED and the First Amended Complaint be DISMISSED, thereby terminating the case.
22 On February 3, 2015, the undersigned adopted the Findings and Recommendations in full, and
23 GRANTED Defendant’s motion to dismiss. On February 4, 2015, judgment was entered and the
24 action was terminated in its entirety.
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the outstanding motions [ECF Nos. 102,
2 103, 104, 108, 121, 123, 143, 144, 147, 149] are DISMISSED as moot.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
July 6, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?