Garcia v. Clark, et al.
Filing
194
ORDER Requiring Defendants to File Pretrial Statement on or Before December 5, 2016, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/29/16. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
WILLIAM GARCIA,
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
1:10-cv-00447-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS
TO FILE PRETRIAL STATEMENT
ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 5,
2016
KEN CLARK, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
This matter is currently set for jury trial on January 24, 2017, with a telephonic trial
13
confirmation hearing to be held on December 8, 2016 before U.S. District Judge Lawrence J.
14
O’Neill. Defendants have not filed a pretrial statement.1
15
confirmation hearing, Defendants are required to file their pretrial statement on or before
16
December 5, 2016, pursuant to Local Rule 281 of the Local Rules of the United States District
17
Court, Eastern District of California.
In light of the upcoming trial
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 29, 2016
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
1
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to the Court’s Amended Second Scheduling Order issued on February 11, 2013, the
parties were ordered to file pretrial statements. (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiff filed his pretrial statement on May 29,
2013. (ECF No. 105.) Defendants were ordered to file their pretrial statement on or before June 14, 2013. (ECF
No. 90.) On June 10, 2013, the case was stayed pending settlement negotiations. (ECF No. 112.) On July 8,
2013, the stay was extended until August 15, 2013. (ECF No. 117.) On August 9, 2013, the stay was extended
until October 3, 2013. (ECF No. 125.) On September 27, 2013, the stay was extended until December 5, 2013.
(ECF No. 130.) Subsequently, the case was dismissed on February 4, 2015 and later reopened on May 18, 2016.
(ECF Nos. 154, 171.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?