Garcia v. Clark, et al.

Filing 48

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File Reply to Defendants' Objections 44 (REPLY DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/23/11. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

WILLIAM P. GARCIA,

12
13
14
15

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00447-OWW-DLB PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO
FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTIONS

v.
KEN CLARK, et al.,

(DOC. 44)
Defendants.

16

REPLY DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14)
DAYS
/

17
18

Plaintiff William P. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

19

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma

20

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on

21

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Palmer, Tolson, Turner, Walter, Santos,

22

Ibarra, Knight, Sanez, Diaz, and Allison for violation of the First Amendment, the Equal

23

Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and

24

Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.

25

On May 5, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. Doc. 8. On July 8,

26

2011, the undersigned issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending Plaintiff’s motion

27

be granted. Doc. 40. On August 15, 2011, Defendants filed their objections. Doc. 44. In light

28

of Defendants’ objections, the Court finds that a reply from Plaintiff would assist the Court in
1

1
2

adjudication of the motion.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a reply to

3

Defendants’ objections within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order. Failure

4

to timely file a reply will be construed as a waiver of the opportunity to reply.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

August 23, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2