Garcia v. Clark, et al.

Filing 86

ORDER vacating Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing re 74 Order. ORDER to SHOW CAUSE regarding Second Scheduling Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/29/2013. Show Cause Response due by 2/4/2013.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

WILLIAM P. GARCIA,

9
10
11

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00447-LJO-DLB PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING TELEPHONIC TRIAL
CONFIRMATION HEARING (ECF No. 74)

v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING
SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER

KEN CLARK, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13

RESPONSE DUE FEBRUARY 4, 2013
/

14
15

Plaintiff William P. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

16

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil action

17

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed

18

May 24, 2010, against Defendants K. Allison, F. Diaz, D. Ibarra, S. Knight, C. Palmer, R.

19

Santos, R. Tolson, K. Turner, and C. Walters for violation of the First Amendment, the Equal

20

Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and

21

Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.

22

On August 24, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Dennis Beck issued a Second

23

Scheduling Order. A telephonic trial confirmation hearing was scheduled for February 7, 2013 at

24

8:30 a.m. Plaintiff was provided until January 17, 2013 by which to file his pretrial statement in

25

this matter. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has failed to comply.

26

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

27

1.

28

The telephonic trial confirmation hearing scheduled for February 7, 2013 is
vacated; and
1

1

2.

Plaintiff is to show cause by February 4, 2013 why this action should not be

2

dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. No extension

3

of time will be granted. If Plaintiff does not file a timely, substantive response, or

4

fails to show good cause, this action will be dismissed.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

January 29, 2013

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
B9ed48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2