Harbridge v. Yates et al

Filing 23

ORDER discharging 21 Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/21/2012. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES A. YATES, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

Case No. 1:10-cv-00473 AWI JLT (PC)
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
(Doc. 21)

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 24, 2012, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a Second

19

Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the Court in its February 24, 2012 and January

20

27, 2012 orders or notify the Court that he wishes to serve the First Amended Complaint on particular

21

Defendants. When the 20-day period, provided by the Court, expired and Plaintiff failed to respond to

22

the Court’s order, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for

23

his failure to prosecute. (Doc. 21.)

24

On March 21, 2012, Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint was docketed though it was “filed”

25

on March 19, 2012. (Doc. 22). Therefore, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS that its March

26

20, 2012 order to show cause (Doc. 21) is discharged.

27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

28

Dated: March 21, 2012
9j7khi

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE