Harbridge v. Yates et al

Filing 27

ORDER Vacating Dismissal Of Second Amended Complaint Without Prejudice (Doc. 25 , 26 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/26/2012. The Court hereby ORDERS: The order issued April 3, 2011 (Doc. 25 ) is VACATED. The Court will re-screen the Second Amended Complaint in due course. Based thereon, the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 26 ) is MOOT. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE,

12

Plaintiff,

13

Case No. 1:10-cv-00473 AWI JLT (PC)
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL OF
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE

vs.
(Docs. 25, 26).

14

JAMES A. YATES, et al.,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil action pursuant to 42

19
20
21
22
23

U.S.C. § 1983. On April 3, 2012, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s Second
Amended Complaint (“SAC”) leave to amend for violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. (Doc. 25.) On
April 19, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration explaining the various aspects of his
SAC. On its own motion, the Court hereby ORDERS:
1.

24
25
26

the Second Amended Complaint in due course;
///
///

27
///
28

The order issued April 3, 2011 (Doc. 25) is VACATED. The Court will re-screen

1

2.

Based thereon, the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 26) is MOOT.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

April 26, 2012

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

9j7khijed