Perridon v. Cate

Filing 6

ORDER GRANTING Defendant Cate's request for relief from responding to the complaint and a thirty day extension of time to respond to the complaint to commence upon issuance of screening order;ORDER requiring Defendant to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 07/30/2010. (Consent or Decline Deadline: 9/3/2010) (Martin, S)

(PC) Perridon v. Cate

Doc. 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (Doc. 3) 18 19 Plaintiff Steven Ray Perridon is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action. 20 Defendant Cate removed the action from Kern County Superior Court on March 24, 2010. 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1441(b). Defendant requests to be relieved of his obligation to respond to the complaint pending 22 screening by the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c). Defendant seeks a 23 thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the 24 screening order. 25 Defendant's request is HEREBY GRANTED, and Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to 26 file a response to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the screening order. Defendant is 27 /// 28 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

STEVEN RAY PERRIDON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00527-SMS PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CATE'S REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM RESPONDING TO THE COMPLAINT, AND FOR A THIRTY DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, TO COMMENCE UPON ISSUANCE OF SCREENING ORDER (Doc. 1) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO CONSENT TO OR DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS /

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDERED to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days, in compliance with the order filed March 25, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 July 30, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2