Mitri v. Walgreen Co.

Filing 104

ORDER on Duplicate Motion 100 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/8/11. Denied as a Duplicate Motion. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
WALGREEN CO., INC. dba
)
WALGREENS, and DOES 1 to 20,
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
SAMI MITRI,

1:10-cv-538 AWI SKO
ORDER ON DUPLICATE
MOTION
(Doc. No. 100)

12
13
On September 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed two motions for new trial on the limited issue of
14
emotional distress damages. See Court’s Docket Doc. Nos. 100, 102. The motions are identical,
15
except the first motion, which is the Doc. No. 100, identifies a hearing date of October 3, 2014.
16
A Clerk’s notice was entered after Doc. No. 100 was filed. The Clerk’s notice reads: “Please
17
disregard docket entry 100 MOTION for NEW TRIAL (incorrect date). Corrected entry to be
18
refiled.” See id. at No. 101. After the Clerk’s notice, Plaintiff refiled his motion as Doc. No.
19
102, but this time with a correct hearing date of October 3, 2011. For administrative purposes
20
only, the Court will deny Doc. No. 100 as being identical to and duplicative of Doc. No. 102.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion at Docket Entry 100 is
22
DENIED as a duplicate motion. This order in no way effects Doc. No. 102 or Doc. No. 102's
23
October 3, 2011 hearing date.
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
ciem0h

September 8, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE