Mitri v. Walgreen Co.

Filing 166

ORDER for Parties to Submit a Joint Status Report, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/17/2016. (Seng, Michael)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SAMI MITRI, 9 10 11 CASE NO. 1:10-CV-538 AWI SKO Plaintiff v. WALGREEN COMPANY, ORDER FOR THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT A JOINT STATUS REPORT Defendant 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 16, 2016, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in this matter. See Doc. No. 164. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded this Court’s decision regarding Defendant’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law. See id. In relevant part, the Ninth Circuit remitted the punitive damages award to $352,000, and remanded the matter for a “new trial if [Plaintiff] declines to accept [the Ninth Circuit’s] remittitur.” Id. The Clerk of this Court reopened this case on September 19, 2016. A review of the Ninth Circuit docket indicates that Plaintiff has accepted the Ninth’s Circuit’s remittitur on September 30, 2016. See Ninth Circuit Docket in Case No. 14-17580, Document No. 53. On October 12, 2016, the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate. See Doc. No. 165. Given Plaintiff’s acceptance of the remittitur, and the now reopened status of this case, it is appropriate for the parties to file a joint status report. The parties should include in their joint status report whether this case should remain open. If the parties fail to file a timely status report, the Court will close this case without further notice. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The parties shall file a joint status report on or by October 24, 2016; and 3 2. The failure of the parties to file a joint status report will result in the closure of this case 4 without further notice. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 17, 2016 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?