First Bank v. American Contractors Indemnity Company
Filing
14
FURTHER STIPULATION and ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT MOTION TO DISMISS currently set for 6/10/2010 has been CONTINUED to 8/12/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 2, 2010. (Lira, I)
First Bank v. American Contractors Indemnity Company
Doc. 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BUCHALTER NEMER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
BUCHALTER NEMER A Professional Corporation JEFFREY B. KIRSCHENBAUM (SBN: 152290) LORI S. LIU (SBN: 225599) 333 Market Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2126 Telephone: (415) 227-0900 Facsimile: (415) 227-0770 Email: jkirschenbaum@buchalter.com Attorneys for Plaintiff FIRST BANK, a Missouri banking corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BAKERSFIELD DIVISION
FIRST BANK, a Missouri banking corporation, Plaintiff, vs. AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation; and DOES 1-50, Defendants.
Case No. 1:10 CV 548 LJO SMS FURTHER STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Date: Time: Dept.: July 22, 2010 8:30 a.m. 4
Plaintiff First Bank, a Missouri banking corporation, and defendant American Contractors Indemnity Company, a California corporation, (hereinafter, "ACIC") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, defendant ACIC noticed its motion to dismiss for hearing on June 10, 2010. AND WHEREAS, the hearing was continued by stipulation and order to July 1, 2010. AND WHEREAS, the hearing was further continued by stipulation and order to July 22, 2010. AND WHEREAS, plaintiff First Bank and defendant ACIC have agreed to settle this lawsuit and are in the process of documenting a settlement agreement that will result in dismissal of this lawsuit. AND WHEREAS, the documentation of the settlement of this lawsuit has taken longer than initially expected since it is complex and involves multiple parties and agreements.
BN 6517828v1
1
S A N FR A N C I S C O
FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BUCHALTER NEMER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
AND WHEREAS, plaintiff First Bank and defendant ACIC agree that a 21-day continuance of the hearing and due dates for opposition and reply briefs would serve the interests of justice. AND WHEREAS, two prior continuances of the hearing date or briefing schedule have been sought or obtained. NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed that defendant ACIC's motion to dismiss shall be heard on August 12, 2010 at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4 of the above-entitled court; plaintiff First Bank's opposition brief shall be filed and served on or before July 29, 2010; and, defendant ACIC's reply brief shall be filed on or before August 5, 2010.
DATED: July 2, 2010
BUCHALTER NEMER A Professional Corporation By: /s/ Jeffrey B. Kirschenbaum Jeffrey B. Kirschenbaum Attorneys for Plaintiff, FIRST BANK
DATED: July 2, 2010
RAUL L. MARTINEZ MARK A. OERTEL LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By: /s/ Raul L. Martinez Raul L. Martinez Attorney for AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY
ORDER Good cause appearing therefore: 1. The hearing of defendant ACIC's motion to dismiss is continued to August 12,
2010, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4 of the above-entitled court. 2. 29, 2010. 2 Plaintiff First Bank's opposition brief shall be filed and served on or before July
BN 6517828v1
S A N FR A N C I S C O
FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BUCHALTER NEMER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
3. 2010.
Defendant ACIC's reply brief shall be filed and served on or before August 5,
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 2, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
BN 6517828v1
3
S A N FR A N C I S C O
FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?