Simmons v. CDCR et al

Filing 28

ORDER DENYING 27 Substitution of Attorneys Without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/23/2014. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER SIMMONS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 1:10-cv-00553-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 27.) JONATHAN AKANNO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 This is a civil action filed by Christopher Simmons (APlaintiff@), a state prisoner 19 proceeding pro se. On May 22, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for substitution of attorneys, 20 requesting to substitute attorney Scottlynn J. Hubbard IV, Esq., in place and stead of himself as 21 attorney of record. (Doc. 27.) 22 II. SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS – LOCAL RULE 182(g) 23 Under Local Rule 182(g), Plaintiff must submit a substitution of attorneys document to 24 the Court, setting forth the full name and address of the new attorney, and signed by Plaintiff 25 (as the withdrawing attorney and client) and the new attorney. Local Rule 182(g) (emphasis 26 added). AAll substitutions of attorneys shall require the approval of the Court, and the words 27 >IT IS SO ORDERED= with spaces designated for the date and signature of the Judge affixed 28 at the end of each substitution of attorneys.@ Id. 1 1 Plaintiff’s request for substitution of attorneys does not include the signature of the new 2 attorney, as required by Local Rule 182(g). Therefore, the request must be denied, without 3 prejudice to submission of a new request, or “Stipulation for Substitution of Attorneys” which 4 meets the requirements of Local Rule 182(g). 5 III. 6 7 CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for substitution of attorneys, filed on May 22, 2014, is DENIED without prejudice. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 23, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?