Simmons v. CDCR et al
Filing
72
ORDER Adopting Findings And Recommendations (ECF Nos. 54 , 69 ), ORDER Dismissing Defendant California Department Of Corrections And Rehabilitation, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/29/2015. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER SIMMONS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:10-cv-00553 AWI-SAB-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF Nos. 54, 69 )
v.
J. AKANNO, et al.,
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Defendant**.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
18 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
19 636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 4, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending
21 dismissal of Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant to
22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The parties were provided an opportunity to file
23 objections within twenty days. To date, No objections have been filed.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this
25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26 Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
27
28
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 69) issued by the Magistrate Judge
3 on September 4, 2015, are adopted in full;
4
2.
Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s motion to
5 dismiss (Doc. No. 54) is GRANTED and that Defendant is dismissed with prejudice, based on
6 Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated: September 29, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?