Simmons v. CDCR et al

Filing 81

ORDER AMENDING Scheduling Order Pursuant to 79 Stipulation of the Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/25/2016. Dispositive Motions Deadline Extended to 5/25/2016. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 CHRISTOPHER SIMMONS, Case No. 1:10-cv-00553-AWI-SAB-PC 14 Plaintiff, ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES 15 v. 16 J. AKANNO, et al., (ECF NO. 79) 17 Defendants. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DUE MAY 25, 2016 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On March 24, 2016, Defendant J. Akanno filed a joint stipulation to extend the dispositive motion filing deadline from March 25, 2016, to May 25, 2016. On the same date, Defendant Akanno filed an association of counsel, indicating that Lawrence Bragg, Deputy Attorney General of the Office of the Attorney General, associates Susan E. Coleman, of the Law Offices of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, as counsel for Defendant Akanno for all matters. The joint stipulation indicates that the Deputy Attorney General’s Office intends to provide new defense counsel with copies of records as soon as possible. The stipulation further indicates that although Deputy Attorney General Lawrence Bragg is ready to file dispositive 28 1 1 motions on behalf of Defendants Covarubbias, Hedgpeth and Kelgord, the parties stipulate that, 2 for the convenience of the Court and parties, the briefing on dispositive motions could be filed at 3 one time. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling 4 5 order is amended to extend the dispositive motion filing deadline to May 25, 2016. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: March 25, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?