Simmons v. CDCR et al
Filing
81
ORDER AMENDING Scheduling Order Pursuant to 79 Stipulation of the Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/25/2016. Dispositive Motions Deadline Extended to 5/25/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
CHRISTOPHER SIMMONS,
Case No. 1:10-cv-00553-AWI-SAB-PC
14
Plaintiff,
ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING
ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF
THE PARTIES
15
v.
16
J. AKANNO, et al.,
(ECF NO. 79)
17
Defendants.
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DUE
MAY 25, 2016
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
On March 24, 2016, Defendant J. Akanno filed a joint stipulation to extend the
dispositive motion filing deadline from March 25, 2016, to May 25, 2016. On the same date,
Defendant Akanno filed an association of counsel, indicating that Lawrence Bragg, Deputy
Attorney General of the Office of the Attorney General, associates Susan E. Coleman, of the
Law Offices of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, as counsel for Defendant Akanno for all
matters.
The joint stipulation indicates that the Deputy Attorney General’s Office intends to
provide new defense counsel with copies of records as soon as possible. The stipulation further
indicates that although Deputy Attorney General Lawrence Bragg is ready to file dispositive
28
1
1 motions on behalf of Defendants Covarubbias, Hedgpeth and Kelgord, the parties stipulate that,
2 for the convenience of the Court and parties, the briefing on dispositive motions could be filed at
3 one time.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling
4
5 order is amended to extend the dispositive motion filing deadline to May 25, 2016.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
March 25, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?