Aubert v. Hector

Filing 36

ORDER Directing Clerk to Move Document 32 from this Case into Case 1:07-cv-1629 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/30/2012. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESS’NN AUBERT, 12 13 14 1:10-cv-00565-LJO-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MOVE DOCUMENT 32 FROM THIS CASE INTO CASE 1:07-CV-01629 vs. HECTOR ROBLES, 15 Defendant. 16 ________________________________/ 17 Ess’nn Aubert (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed an opposition to a motion for 19 summary judgment in this action. (Doc. 32.) It is apparent that this opposition was meant to 20 oppose the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Mario Garcia on March 15, 2012 in 21 Plaintiff's other pending case 1:07-cv-01629-LJO-GSA-PC (Aubert v. Elijah, et al.) (Doc. 61). 22 Although Plaintiff used the case number for the present case on the front of the opposition, he used 23 the case caption "Ess'nn A. Aubert vs. Kevin Elijah, et al." and referred throughout the opposition 24 to defendants Mario Garcia and Elijah, the defendants in case 1:07-cv-01629-LJO-GSA-PC. The 25 only defendant in the present case is defendant Hector Robles. Based on this evidence, the Clerk 26 shall be directed to move the opposition into case 1:07-cv-01629-LJO-GSA-PC. 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, the Clerk is HEREBY DIRECTED to move the opposition to motion for 2 summary judgment filed on April 13, 2012 in this action (Document 32) into Plaintiff's other 3 pending case 1:07-cv-01629-LJO-GSA-PC (Aubert v. Elijah, et al.). 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij August 30, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?