Enriquez et al v. City Of Fresno et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 06/30/2010. (Flores, E)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com WESLEY E. OVERSON (CA SBN 154737) WOverson@mofo.com THEODORE M. HASSE (CA SBN 257794) THasse@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street, Suite 3200 San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Tel: 415.268.7000 Fax: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ, individually and as successor-in-interest to STEVEN ANTHONY VARGAS, Deceased; JANE CARLOS VARGAS; AMADO VARGAS; STEVEN ANTHONY VARGAS, JR. (a minor through his guardian ad litem, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ); ANGELO ALECZANDER VARGAS (a minor through his guardian ad litem, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ); JOSE BLAS FIGUEROA, JR. (a minor through his guardian ad litem, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ); HAILEY ROSE FIGUEROA (a minor through her guardian ad litem, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ); and LEAH REALYNN GORTAREZ-ENRIQUEZ (a minor through her guardian ad litem, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ), Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation; JERRY DYER, individually and in his capacity as a Chief of Police for the CITY OF FRESNO; MIKE PALOMINO, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF FRESNO; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
Case No.
10-CV-00581-AWI-DLB
STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND ORDER Complaint filed: April 5, 2010
Stipulation Regarding Amended Complaint
Civil Case No. 10-CV-00581-AWI-DLB sf-2864394
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DEAC_Signature-END:
The parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that the plaintiffs may amend their complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is attached hereto. The parties further stipulate that the defendants may have ten (10) days to file an answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 30, 2010 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ WESLEY E. OVERSON THEODORE M. HASSE MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By:
/s/ Wesley E. Overson WESLEY E. OVERSON [woverson@mofo.com] Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: June 30, 2010
JAMES D. WEAKLEY ROSEMARY T. MCGUIRE MICHAEL R. LINDEN
WEAKLEY, ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP
By:
/s/ Rosemary T. McGuire ROSEMARY T. MCGUIRE [rosie@wam-llp.com] Attorneys for Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
June 30, 2010
/s/ Dennis
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3b142a
Stipulation Regarding Amended Complaint
Civil Case No. 10-CV-00581-AWI-DLB sf-2864394
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?